 |
|
|
|||||
Never in human history has there been a greater concentration of wealth than in Silicon Valley. The three most valuable corporations in the world have their headquarters in the region, within a few miles of one another, in addition to many other unfathomably wealthy people and companies. It would logically follow that such a place would have some of the worlds finest architecture, as weve seen in previous centers of economic power. Think: Beijing in the Ming Dynasty, Venice in the Renaissance, New York and Chicago in the early 20th century. But no, Silicon Valley looks like just about any other American suburb (with a few notable exceptions). The future is invented in boxy office parks shielded from the street by hedges and parking lots. Tourists who come to see the global epicenter of innovation inevitably leave disappointed. Cupertino, CA. [Photo: Wangkun Jia/Adobe Stock] This disconnect periodically causes a stir on social media. Matthew Yglesias captured the mood of a recent round of X discourse, posting, The tech industry would be so much cooler if it built iconic skyscraper headquarters instead of this lame office park bullshit. How did Silicon Valley end up like this? Its partially the story of a place that came into its own in the mid-to-late 20th century, a time when sprawl was the overriding mandate of American urban planning. But there are actually more particular reasons for Silicon Valleys architectural identity, rooted in the tech industrys history and ideology. Stanford Research Park (then called Stanford Industrial Park), 1955. [Photo: courtesy Stanford University] Research Park inc. In 1953, Stanford University and the city of Palo Alto opened a new joint development about a mile from campus called Stanford Industrial Park. The university marketed the complex as a hub for smokeless industry, where university affiliates could commercialize their cutting-edge research. It was immediately an enormous success, incubating Silicon Valley giants like Varian Associates and Hewlett-Packard, and later, Meta and Tesla. The first building in Stanford Research Park, Varian Associates, 1953. [Photo: courtesy Stanford University] Stanford Research Park, as it’s now known, is a fairly ordinary-looking office park to contemporary eyes. But at the time of its construction, there was nothing like it in the world. Its design reflected its identity as a fusion of the university, the factory, and the corporate office, Louise Mozingo writes in the book Pastoral Capitalism: A History of Suburban Corporate Landscapes. Stanford Research Park employed modernist architectural principles dictating the arrangement and spacing of buildings. The office parks developers were required to leave more than half of the land area as open space, and to establish 90-foot landscaped buffers separating buildings from surrounding streets, much like the rules governing tower-in-the-green-style housing projects going up in central cities. Stanford Research Parks zoning rules were based on earlier policies enacted by the neighboring city of Menlo Park in its Administrative, Professional, Executive, and Research zone in 1948. This was the ur-code for office park zoning, mandating strictly limited lot coverage, large lot sizes, generous parking requirements, and banning noxious industrial processes. Silicon Valley may have pioneered the economic and regulatory frameworks for office park development across the U.S., but it did so with a local flavor. Varian Associates main entrance, 1953. [Photo: courtesy Stanford University] Unlike the corporate estates that companies like General Motors and Bell Labs were building concurrently east of the Mississippi, early Silicon Valley office campuses lacked fancy executive wings. At Hewlett-Packards Stanford Research Park offices, open, non-hierarchical floorplans enabled executives to practice management by walking around. Facebook (now Meta) would follow the same principles in its early years, situating C-suite brass among mid-level associates, as depicted in The Social Network. This layout is meant to stimulate creative thinking by creating chance encounters between workers from different departments. Silicon Valley firms also had a special proclivity for utilitarian architecture. While blue chip industrial giantsbuilt palatial, starchitect-designed campusesthink of Bell Labs reflective obsidian block featured on Severanceto signal their power and permanence, rising Silicon Valley firms had more low-key taste. This has, at times, been ascribed to the poor design sensibilities of the nerdy engineers who ran these firms. Why waste money on expensive frills when the firm is ruthlessly focused on innovation and growth? But a disinterest in architecture may have reflected deeper priorities. In an essay called, The Virtual Architecture of Silicon Valley, architectural historian Gwendolyn Wright notes that the buildings of the area have remained resolutely bland, superficial, and ephemeral. This may in fact signal not mere cheapness but also an alternative aesthetic, as yet unarticulated: a self-conscious aversion to architectural representations of hierarchy, stability, and technological permanence. Working at the frontiers of technology and economic transformation, Silicon Valley companies needed highly adaptable workplaces. Venture capital infusions could necessitate rapid upscaling; market crashes meant rapid downscaling. Companies that had disrupted existing industries were wary of their own disruption, and made workplace decisions accordingly. Silicon Valley is littered with hermit crab shellsold office parks that have housed multiple generations of next big things. Alphabets Mountain View headquarters was built for Silicon Graphics. Metas Menlo Park campus was once home to Sun Microsystems. Apple Park [Photo: Zenstratus/Adobe Stock] Future aesthetic As the current crop of Silicon Valley titans have grown into trillion-dollar businesses, their corporate architecture has evolved to reflect their wealth, power, and, its hoped, permanence. Apple Park, a perfectly circular ring designed by Lord Norman Foster in consultation with Steve Jobs and Jony Ive, is a blast from the future, successfully delivering on its promise to translate Apples product design aesthetic into architecture. Meta Menlo Park [Photo: Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu Agency] Not to be outdone, Meta and Alphabet subsequently brought on Frank Gehry and Bjarke Ingalls to design portions of their campuses. Next up is Nvidia, which hired Gensler to create a pair of canopied mega-structures sheltering multiple interior office blocks at its rapidly expanding Santa Clara campus. Thanks to these projects, Silicon Valley is gaining an architectural identity. But it remains a private, primarily virtual architecture. Silicon Valleys architectural achievements are canceled out by its urbanistic deficiencies. Besides the employees and business partners who are permitted on campus, few others will regularly see these buildings in person, and virtually none will regularly see them on foot. They are mainly designed to be viewed from the middle distance in photos and videos, offering a glitzy visual shorthand for the companies that call them home. Nvidia Headquarters [Photo: PhotoSpirit/Adobe Stock] Unlike a downtown office tower, these campuses will never be experienced by masses of passerby. They will never be civic landmarks in the way of the Transamerica Pyramid or the Chrysler Building. Theyre all on their own, not characters in a vibrant urban scene. If Apple ever goes the way of Chrysler, or Nvidia pulls a Transamerica, their campuses will become hermit crab shells themselvesbig, weird hermit crab shells.
Category:
E-Commerce
Entertainment in 2026 is a bit of a double-edged sword. Excellent films and television shows are widely available in ways that would have sounded like science fiction just 20 years agobut at a steep price. A single movie ticket costs an average of $16, while the average American household spends over $42 per month on streaming services, which adds up to $504 per year. And if youre anything like me, you may not even be getting your moneys worth on those streaming services. Often when I sit down to watch something, I scroll through the options on Netflix, only to go to bed an hour later without having watched anything. In many cases, that decision paralysis reflects my desire to recreate the feeling of watching something I loved, which is impossible. (What do you mean theres no show or movie that will give me the same emotions I felt watching Outlander for the first time?) However, there is an easy and free solution to this entertainment conundrum: your local library. Your library card will help you access books, ebooks, DVDs, audiobooks, and other media that can help you get your entertainment on for freeand can offer you similar stories to the movies and television shows that have captured your imagination. If youre looking to lower your entertainment costs, here are some recommendations for what to pick up at your local library. If you loved Sinners With sixteen Oscar nominationsthe most in Academy Award historyRyan Cooglers Jim Crow-era horror film offers some insightful allegories of racism and cultural appropriation within a tense and emotional vampire flick. If youd like more vampire lore or gore with a side of cultural commentary, you might check these out from your library: My Soul to Keep by Tananarive Due: Originally published in 1997, this is the first book in Dues African Immortals four-part series. When Jessica, an African-American journalist for the Miami Herald, marries David, her Mr. Perfect, she has no idea he is actually a 450-year-old immortal who traded his soul for unending life. Initially, she shrugs off warning signs, such as the fact that he seems strangely youthful and his injuries heal too quickly, but David eventually tells her the truth when his immortal brothers come to retrieve him. When the people around Jessica start dying violently, David plans to make her and their daughter immortal, whether they want it or not. Fledgling by Octavia Butler: Butlers final novel before her death in 2006, Fledgling tells the story of Shori, a girl with amnesia who discovers that she is in fact a 53-year-old genetically modified vampire. Despite her memory loss, she must work to discover who has made her what she is and find a way to save herself and those she cares for. Dread Nation by Justina Ireland: Rather than vampires, Irelands 2018 YA novel imagines that zombies began walking the battlefields of Gettysburg during the Civil War. Jane McKeene was born two days before the dead rose, and as a Black child, she is required to attend a combat school to learn how to protect the living from the walking dead. Get Out, Us, and Nope, directed by Jordan Peele: Ryan Coogler specifically credited Jordan Peele as one of the filmmakers who influenced his work on Sinners. While none of Peeles three masterpieces specifically deal with vampires or other traditional monsters, each one does look at horror tropes through the lens of race and culture similar to how Coogler does in Sinners. If youve lost count of your Heated Rivalry reheats The global phenomenon written and directed by Jacob Tierney and based on the bestselling book series by Rachel Reid has made it clear that romance is not dead, although it does involve more ginger ale, loon calls, and concussions than anticipated. If you havent already read the entire Game Changers series (and you may have had trouble getting copies at your local library), Reid has also written two standalone novels, Time to Shine and The Shots You Take. But there is a long and storied history of queer sports romance that you can check out from your local library while waiting for season two of Heated Rivalry and book seven of Game Changers: Gravity by Tal Bauer: This friends-to-lovers hockey romance finds self-proclaimed middle-of-the-road player Hunter Lacey starstruck when he meets his hero, 26-year-old Bryce Michel at the All Star Game. But the two men have instant chemistry on and off the ice. If you like your hockey romance to feature plenty of time on the ice, this is the book for you. Wake Up, Nat & Darcy by Kate Cochrane: In this second-chance hockey romance, Darcy LaCroix and Natalie Carpenter were once college teammates, friends, and lovers. But that was years ago, before Darcy broke Nats heart and they became bitter rivals. After being cut from the U.S. womens hockey team, Nat takes a guest hosting gig on Wake Up, USAs winter games coveragewith Darcy as her co-host. The snark and banter between Nat and Darcy is reminiscent of the playful and sometimes biting chirps shared between Shane and Ilya in Heated Rivalry
Category:
E-Commerce
Want more housing market stories from Lance Lamberts ResiClub in your inbox? Subscribe to the ResiClub newsletter. Heres the annual U.S. household income needed to purchase the typical valued U.S. home: January 2020: $52,041 January 2021: $52,087 January 2022: $63,111 January 2023: $87,092 January 2024: $93,227 January 2025: $98,900 January 2026: $93,061 While the income needed to buy the median-priced U.S. home is +78.8% higher than it was in January 2020, its down -5.9% year over year. Methodology: This Zillow calculation is conservative and assumes a 20% down payment and that the homebuyer spends less than 30% of their monthly income on the total monthly payment. This is a financed purchase, of course. For typical home value, Zillow economists used the latest Zillow Home Value Index reading. window.addEventListener("message",function(a){if(void 0!==a.data["datawrapper-height"]){var e=document.querySelectorAll("iframe");for(var t in a.data["datawrapper-height"])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";r.style.height=d}}}); Regional housing markets that have experienced outright home price corrections since the end of the pandemic housing boom have seen faster affordability improvements. That said, many of those placeslike the Austin, Texas, metro areaalso experienced greater home price overheating during the pandemic housing boom. How did we get here? During the pandemic housing boom, housing demand surged rapidly amid ultralow interest rates, stimulus, and the remote work boom. Federal Reserve researchers estimate that new construction would have had to increase by roughly 300% to absorb the pandemic-era surge in demand. Unlike housing demand, housing supply isnt as elastic and can’t quickly ramp up like that. As a result, the heightened pandemic-era demand drained the market of active inventory and sent national home prices soaring. The typical U.S. home value measured by the Zillow Home Value Index in January 2026 is still a staggering +44.7% greater than in January 2020. That overheated home price growth, coupled with the ensuing mortgage rate shock, with the average 30-year fixed mortgage rate jumping up from under 3% to over 7%, created the fastest-ever deterioration in housing affordability in 2022. Over the past two years, housing affordability has improved some; however, it still remains challenged. While the exact hit has varied, this decades affordability squeeze has spread across much of the countryjust look at the two maps below. window.addEventListener("message",function(a){if(void 0!==a.data["datawrapper-height"]){var e=document.querySelectorAll("iframe");for(var t in a.data["datawrapper-height"])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";r.style.height=d}}}); window.addEventListener("message",function(a){if(void 0!==a.data["datawrapper-height"]){var e=document.querySelectorAll("iframe");for(var t in a.data["datawrapper-height"])for(var r,i=0;r=e[i];i++)if(r.contentWindow===a.source){var d=a.data["datawrapper-height"][t]+"px";r.style.height=d}}}); The challenge, of course, is that incomes havent kept up. The gap has narrowed since the end of 2022; however, its still wide. While the annual U.S. household income needed to purchase a typical U.S. home increased by +78.8% between January 2020 and January 2026, average weekly earnings of U.S. workers have risen by +30.7%, and overall U.S. consumer inflation has grown by +26% during the same period.
Category:
E-Commerce
All news |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||