 |
|
|
|||||
If youre someone who sneaks off to the bathroom for a little phone time, you could be upping your odds of developing hemorrhoids. A recent survey suggests Americans spend two full days a year scrolling on the toilet. Now, new research shows that people who bring their phone to scroll social media are 46% more likely to get hemorrhoids than those who dont. Hemorrhoidsswollen veins in the lower rectum that can cause pain, itching, and bleedingare often linked to straining. But lingering on the toilet itself has now been identified as a bigger risk. Research published last week found phone users spend five times longer on the toilet, which increases pressure on anal tissue and raises the likelihood of haemorrhoids. About 54% of respondents reported reading the news, while 44% scrolled social media. Hemorrhoids affect about half of U.S. adults over 50, leading to nearly 4 million doctor or ER visits annually and more than $800 million in healthcare spending. While most cases resolve on their own, some require medical treatment or even surgery. The study, published in PLOS One, focused on participants over 45. But in a related study of college students, nearly all admitted to bringing their phones to the toilet. Of course, bathroom reading long predates smartphonesbut flipping through a shampoo bottle or toilet book rarely leads to the half-hour distractions common with Instagram or TikTok. How often have you finished your business, washed your hands, and then realized youve been sitting and scrolling for far longer than you intended? Researchers recommend leaving the phone outside the bathroom altogetheror, if thats unthinkable, limiting yourself to two TikToks at most. This study bolsters advice to people in general to leave the smartphones outside the bathroom and to try to spend no more than a few minutes to have a bowel movement, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center gastroenterologist Trisha Pasricha said in a statement. If it’s taking longer, ask yourself why. Was it because having a bowel movement was really so difficult, or was it because my focus was elsewhere?
Category:
E-Commerce
Trading app Robinhood Markets, mobile app monetization company AppLovin, and building company Emcor Group, will be added to the S&P 500 later this month, S&P Dow Jones Indices announced Friday. Robinhood will replace Caesar’s Entertainment, AppLovin will take MarketAxess Holding’s spot, and Emcor will take Enphase Energy’s place. The changes take effect on September 22. The S&P 500 rebalances the index quarterly. No changes were made at the start of the most recent quarter in June. “The changes ensure each index is more representative of its market capitalization range. The companies being removed from the S&P SmallCap 600 are no longer representative of the small-cap market space,” the S&P Dow Jones Indices said. Robinhood shares up following S&P promotion In the minutes after the announcement, shares of Robinhood were up 7.2%, while AppLovin rose 7.8%, and Emcor, 2.7%. Strategy, a bitcoin company that was rumored to have possibly made the cut, was passed over. Its stock took a 2.5% dive following the announcement. The promotions come after Robinhood CEO and co-founder Vlad Tenev had expressed hope that the company could join the S&P 500 soon. Its a difficult thing to plan for, Tenev said at the companys annual shareholder meeting in June. I think its one of those things that hopefully happens. The S&P announcement could boost Robinhoods expansion toward becoming a one-stop banking service: In March, the company announced plans to launch Robinhood Banking, a service for its Gold members that would include perks like having cash delivered to you instead of having to go to the ATM. Taxi company Uber also got a boost: It has been promoted to the S&P 100, replacing Charter Communications, the S&P Dow Jones Indices announced.
Category:
E-Commerce
Artificial intelligence startup Anthropic has agreed to pay a record-setting $1.5 billion to a group of book authors and publishers in order to settle a class action lawsuit. The payout is thought to be the largest in the history of U.S. copyright suits and could influence other cases where an AI company has been sued for copyright violations. This settlement sends a powerful message to AI companies and creators alike that taking copyrighted works from these pirate websites is wrong, Justin Nelson, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said in a statement. The suit, filed last year, was brought by authors Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson over copyright infringement. They alleged that Anthropic used the authors’ copyrighted books to train its chatbot, Claude. Is AI training ‘fair use’? In June, a judge ruled that while Anthropic was allowed to train its AI model using books that it had acquired the copyright for under fair use rules, the startup had illegally acquired books via online libraries that contained bootleg copies of books. The judge concluded that the authors had cause for the case to proceed to a trial. That was slated to start in December. Now, according to a court filing on Friday, the startup has agreed to pay authors $3,000 for each of around 500,000 books it used to train its AI, plus interest. The company also agreed to destroy the datasets containing the allegedly pirated material. As best as we can tell, its the largest copyright recovery ever, Nelsons said, according to the Associated Press It is the first of its kind in the AI era, he added.“Today’s settlement, if approved, will resolve the plaintiffs’ remaining legacy claims. We remain committed to developing safe AI systems that help people and organizations extend their capabilities, advance scientific discovery, and solve complex problems, Anthropics deputy general counsel Aparna Sridhar said in a statement. What does this mean for other AI companies? The settlement may give other AI companies facing similar challenges to their use of copyrighted material to train their models pause. Back in June, the judge in this case affirmed that using books to train a large language model represented a transformative use of the workcrucial for fair usebut made a clear distinction if the books had been sourced illegally. Since chatbots exploded onto the scene in late 2022, authors have repeatedly expressed concern that the models that power them were trained using their works without permission. In 2023, The Authors Guild, a professional organization for writers, sent an open letter to the CEOs of prominent AI companies calling for them to get authors consent before using their’ works to train models. More than 15,000 authors signed the open letter; best-selling author Nora Roberts was among them. “If creators arent compensated fairly, they cant afford to create. If writers arent paid to write, they cant afford to write,” she said at the time. Anthropic is not the only AI startup at the center of a copyright case: OpenAI was sued in 2023 by more than a dozen authors for copyright infringement in the training of its large language modelsthe suit is still pending. And another suit brought by authors against Meta on similar grounds was dismissed earlier this year, but the judge did not weigh in on whether the companys use of copyrighted materials to train its AI was legal. The judge in the case has scheduled a hearing on Monday to review the settlement terms; he will need to approve it before it can go ahead.
Category:
E-Commerce
All news |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||