 |
|
|
|||||
PsiQuantum, the Palo Alto-based startup thats been tapped to build quantum computers in Chicago and Brisbane, Australia, has raised a $1 billion dollar Series E that values the 9-year-old company at $7 billion. The round was led by BlackRock, Baillie Gifford, and Temasek, and includes NVentures, the venture capital arm of chip maker Nvidia. The deal is one of the largest single private investments in quantum computing technology to date. While your average person would be hard-pressed to explain what a quantum computer does, or why youd want one, investors have decided that they want in. Since the start of September, the quantum computing industry has seen some of its largest funding rounds yet, including a $320 million Series B for Finnish company IQM and a $600 million capital raise for Quantinuum, a joint venture of Honeywell, at a $10 billion pre-money valuation. Also this week, Infleqtion announced plans to go public via special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC), targeting proceeds of about $540 million. An ‘aggressive road map’ to big systems PsiQuantum cofounder and chief science officer Pete Shadbolt says the new funding will help the company realize its plans to build a photonics-based, utility-scale quantum computer. (PsiQuantum has tested key components of its system but has not yet built a complete quantum computer.) PsiQuantum has been shifting from the centimeter scale work of chip and device design, Shadbolt says, to focus on the kilometer scale work of building out cooling cabinets and other infrastructure for data-center-size computing facilities. He says the new funds will also help PsiQuantum scale up its manufacturing of the bespoke parts and materials that will be used in intermediate-scale systems. We do have a very aggressive road map to get to big systems, but were not trying to do it all in one leap, he says. The round includes existing investors Third Point Ventures and T. Rowe Price Associates, along with newcomers such as Macquarie Capital, Qatar Investment Authority, Counterpoint Global (Morgan Stanley), and S Ventures (SentinelOne). PsiQuantum has now raised just over $1.8 billion, according to the company. AI exuberance meets quantum computing The AI-level influx of capital into quantum computing in recent weeks could be a sign of the technology maturing, or of investors with AI FOMO trying to catch the next big thing. Or both. “AI is built on classical computing, which has underpinned the last 50 years of technology, Tony Kim, head of the Fundamental Equities Technology Group at BlackRock, said in the funding announcement for PsiQuantum. Now, we are at the dawn of an adjacent computing platformrooted in quantum mechanicsthat will allow us to simulate the physical world with transformative accuracy. The tech stack of the future will integrate quantum computing and AI, paving the way for machine superintelligence.” Luke Ward, private companies investment manager at Baillie Gifford, an early PsiQuantum investor, said in the announcement, The company has consistently hit technical milestones while forging deep partnerships across industry and government. With a vision rooted in practicality, PsiQuantum is now positioned at the forefront of what could be a trillion-dollar industry, able to solve some of humanitys biggest challenges. This goes beyond what is possible with AI. Both statements help explain the entry of Nvidia into the space, which marks a remarkable turnaround. At his CES keynote talk in January 2025, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang had suggested that useful quantum computers were still about 20 years away, sending publicly traded quantum-related stocks plunging. But he has apparently revised his assessment, declaring at the GPU Technology Conference (GTC) in Paris this June that quantum computing is reaching an inflection point. Now the company is putting money on it. NVentures investment in PsiQuantum is its third quantum deal since the start of the monthand its third quantum deal ever. NVentures also joined the latest funding round for Quantinuum, which uses trapped-ion technology in its computers. And yesterday, QuErawhich makes quantum computers that use so-called neutral atomsannounced an unspecified investment from NVentures to expand a $230 million Series B round announced in February. Collaborating with Nvidia In addition to the investment support from NVentures, PsiQuantum is collaborating with Nvidia across a broad range of development areas, including quantum algorithms and software, the integration of quantum processors and GPUs in so-called hybrid systems, and PsiQuantums silicon photonics platform. No quantum computer is going to be useful in a vacuum, says Shadbolt. Quantum computers are going to generate data [for AI] and they also need input from GPU clusters. So, thats a really natural place for Nvidia to get involved. Already in the Japanese quantum computing ecosystem there’s a big Nvidia GPU cluster plugged into a bunch of quantum computers. That’s sort of a growing trend around the world. PsiQuantums extensive work in photonicsthe transmission of information via lightmake it an appealing strategic partner, as makers of AI super computers are increasingly looking to integrate photonics to keeping up with the massive data transmission and energy demands of AI systems as they grow. Earlier, this week, chipmaker Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) showed off its new COUPE (Compact Universal Photonic Engine) process for manufacturing densely layered chips that fuses photonic integrated circuits and electronic integrated circuits, at the Silicon Photonics Global Summit in Taiwan. Nvidias investments across three different quantum computing platformseach pursuing a different technology for generating qubits, the fundamental units of quantum informationsuggest that it is hedging its technological bets. The competition, says Shadbolt at PsiQuantum, is simultaneously frustrating and very exciting. Its frustrating that we all use different technologies and its vociferously debated. On the other hand, I think that’s a symptom of this being a journey that is just beginning, and I’d rather be on a journey that’s beginning than a journey that is coming to its end.
Category:
E-Commerce
In boardrooms and startup accelerators around the world, a counterintuitive truth is emerging: the leaders who move fastest are often the ones who deliberately slow down. While our Western culture glorifies the perpetual sprint, elite performers are discovering what Navy SEALs have known for decades”slow is smooth, and smooth is fast.” The Tyranny of Chronos Our modern productivity obsession is rooted in what the ancient Greeks called chronoslinear, measurable time that ticks relentlessly forward on our calendars and clocks. This is the time of deadlines, sprint cycles, and quarterly earnings reports. It’s quantitative, urgent, and unforgiving. But the Greeks recognized another dimension of time entirely: kairosthe right time, the opportune moment, time that’s qualitative rather than quantitative. Kairos is the difference between sending an email at 2 a.m. because you can, and sending it when your recipient is most likely to engage meaningfully with your message. It’s the difference between filling your calendar with back-to-back meetings versus creating space for the kind of strategic thinking that actually moves the needle. The most successful entrepreneurs and leaders I’ve worked with have learned to dance between both types of time, but they’ve discovered that honoring kairos often requires the courage to slow down in a chronos-obsessed world. The SEAL Philosophy in the C-Suite When Navy SEALs say “slow is smooth, and smooth is fast,” they’re describing a mindset that prioritizes precision over speed, preparation over reactive rushing. In high-stakes military operations, moving too quickly can mean missed details, poor communication, and catastrophic failure. The same principle applies to business leadership. Consider the CEO who spends an extra week refining their product strategy rather than rushing to market. That deliberate deceleration often prevents months of costly pivots later. Or the manager who invests time in really understanding a team conflict rather than applying a quick fix that creates deeper resentment. This isn’t about moving slowly for its own sakeit’s about moving at the speed of insight rather than the speed of anxiety. The Three-Part Rhythm of Peak Performance The most effective leaders operate in a rhythm I call “Move. Think. Rest.”or MTR, pronounced motorthree integrative phases that honor both chronos and kairos time: Move: This is the phase to step away from your desk, to get out of your head and into your body so that you can activate those feel-good hormoneslike serotonin, endorphins and dopaminein order to bring calm to the chaos and energy to blah thinking. It could take the form of an in-person walking meeting; a walking meeting on the phone, sans video; or a team standing meeting. It might also take the form of a dance break. Humans are designed to move, and the type of movement I describe is intentional and finite. It helps you to shift away from rushing to entering a flow state. Think: This is your kairos timespace for backcasting (reflection, memory, metacognition) as well as forecasting (imagination, dreaming, and daydreaming). It’s when you pause to step back from the tactical and zoom out so that you can actually think more strategically. Many leaders skip this phase, jumping from one action item to the next, then wonder why they feel perpetually reactive rather than proactive. Rest: True rest isn’t just for physical recoveryit’s purpose is also for cognitive and emotional renewal. It’s the space where your subconscious continues processing complex challenges while your conscious mind recuperates. It allows for your default mode network to kick in. The DMN is the meaning-making part of the brain and it goes to work when you are not engaged with the world. The leaders who understand this phase gain access to insights that their always-on competitors miss. The Value of Emotional Recovery This emotional recovery component of MTR is particularly crucial for leaders. As executive coach Scott Peltin pointed out to me, leaders spend their days absorbing the emotional energy of their teamsfielding frustrations, celebrating wins, navigating conflicts, and holding space for others’ anxieties and ambitions. Without intentional emotional recovery, leaders become depleted reservoirs, unable to provide the steady presence their organizations need. Emotional recovery isn’t just about taking a vacation or getting enough sleep (though both help). It’s about creating regular practices that allow you to process and release the emotional residue of leadership. This might mean a daily walk without podcasts or music, journaling to externalize swirling thoughts, or simply sitting quietly for 10 minutes between high-stakes meetings to reset your emotional baseline. Practical Applications for the Overwhelmed Executive How do you implement this philosophy when your calendar is already packed and expectations are sky-high? Start small: Introduce “Think Time” blocks in your calendar. Even 15 minutes before major decisions can shift you from reactive to strategic mode. Practice the “24-hour rule” for important communications. Draft that crucial email or decision, then sit on it overnight. You’ll be amazed how often this prevents costly mistakes. Create “slow lanes” in your workflow. Designate certain projects or decisions as nonurgent, allowing them the time they need to marinate for optimal outcomes. Build in emotional recovery rituals. Schedule brief transition moments between intense meetings. Even three minutes of deep breathing or stepping outside can prevent emotional buildup that clouds judgment later in the day. Embrace strategically saying no. Every yes to something urgent is often a no to something important. Slow leaders understand that protecting their kairos time sometimes means disappointing people who operate purely in chronos time. The Competitive Advantage of Deliberate Pace In our hyperconnected world, the ability to slow down becomes a differentiator. While your competitors are spinning their wheels in perpetual motion, you’re gaining the clarity that comes from operating at the speed of wisdom rather than the speed of fear. The future belongs to leaders who can resist the cultural pressure to confuse motion with progress, who understand that in an age of infinite information and constant connectivity, the scarcest resource isn’t timeit’s attention. And attention, like wine, improves with the right kind of patience. Remember: in a world obsessed with faster, the leaders who master the art of strategic slowness don’t just survivethey flourish.
Category:
E-Commerce
By now weve all heard of tech debtthe costs well have to incur in the future to maintain suboptimal software and technology decisions from the pastbut in three decades as a tech executive, Ive come to observe a far more insidious phenomenon that threatens to undermine business transformation: process and data debt. Unlike tech debt, process debt isnt just ITs problem. The accumulation of manual workarounds, inconsistent data practices, and inefficient workflows that build up over time spreads throughout the organization, affecting every department, from accounting to supply chain. And process debt is the number-one thing that will stand in the way of a companys ability to adopt AI to innovate and reinvent itself. Process debt doesn’t just slow down AI initiatives; it fundamentally stops them from reaching their potential as we move toward more autonomous systems. The Tomato Problem Consider something simple: ordering 1,000 kilograms of tomatoes. Due to natural moisture loss, only 950 kilograms arrive. The supplier invoices for the full amount. Most systems escalate this to human review. But when operational foundations are clean, autonomous AI approaches this differently. It understands tomatoes typically lose 5% in transport, factors in seasonal patterns, then processes autonomously. More importantly, it builds institutional knowledge for future decisions. This is the difference between AI that frustrates and AI that transforms. Your Roof Collapses In insurance, we’ve seen property claims processing transformed from days-long research into minutes of intelligent analysis. AI systems now handle complex items, such as custom artwork, by leveraging deep databases and sophisticated reasoning. The results: an 80% reduction in processing time and a 23% improvement in pricing accuracy, representing millions of dollars in annual value while dramatically improving the customer experience. The lesson wasn’t about efficiency gains. It was about how AI performs when you design processes around its capabilities rather than retrofitting it onto existing workflows. The Learning Gap What we’re seeing validated in research confirms what many suspected: there’s a fundamental difference between organizations that succeed with AI and those that don’t. Recent MIT research shows that 95% of enterprise AI initiatives struggle to deliver value, not because of technology limitations, but because most systems cannot adapt and integrate effectively into existing workflows. Gartner reinforces this trend, predicting that by 2030, more than 50% of AI models will be domain-specific, tailored to industry or function, up from 5% today. The pattern is clear: generic solutions cannot address the unique operational challenges that define real business value. An Agentic Order of Operations The most impactful AI transformations start with addressing process and data debt first. Organizations that clean up their operational foundations unlock AI’s full potential. Those that don’t find themselves constrained by legacy inefficiencies, regardless of their technology investment. This creates an interesting dynamic. As AI becomes more autonomous, competitive advantage increasingly belongs to organizations willing to do the hard work of liquidating process debt before deploying sophisticated systems. What This Means for Leaders We’re entering an era where AI does not just assist. It makes autonomous decisions and manages entire business ecosystems. The organizations that understand this are building the foundations that will define tomorrow’s competitive landscape. In my experience, the answer lies not in the sophistication of your AI models, but in the quality of the operational foundation you build to support them. That foundation work happening today determines who leads in the autonomous economy of tomorrow. I often say, There is no artificial intelligence without process intelligence. The companies that understand this distinction will be the ones that thrive.
Category:
E-Commerce
All news |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||